Game 1
Trish Stratus
(10-15-0) W2 «
| 51.52 |
Commandos
(10-15-0) L2
| 49.12 |
Trish Stratus leads overall, 6-4-0 |
Trish Stratus has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Commandos has outscored Trish Stratus,
537.06-480.34 overall |
Trish Stratus leads regular season series, 5-4-0 |
Commandos has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Commandos has outscored Trish Stratus,
487.94-428.82 in the regular season |
Trish Stratus leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
Trish Stratus has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Trish Stratus has outscored Commandos,
51.52-49.12 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1996 | 4 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 39.08 - 35.46 | 1996 | 9 | Commandos def. Trish Stratus | 57.56 - 35.78 | 1996 | 11 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 45.18 - 33.62 | 1997 | 5 | Commandos def. Trish Stratus | 82.54 - 46.68 | 1998 | 1 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 86.8 - 67.46 | 1999 | 1 | Commandos def. Trish Stratus | 47.94 - 36.14 | 2000 | 4 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 50.04 - 46.14 | 2000 | 9 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 61.72 - 59.92 | 2000 | 11 | Commandos def. Trish Stratus | 57.3 - 27.4 | |
|
Game 2
Bad Karma
(18-7-0) W1 «
| 110.56 |
Transient
(8-16-1) L6
| 41.82 |
Transient leads overall, 9-7-0 |
Bad Karma has won 4 straight in the overall series |
Bad Karma has outscored Transient,
1010.38-910.62 overall |
Transient leads regular season series, 8-6-0 |
Bad Karma has won 3 straight in the regular season series |
Bad Karma has outscored Transient,
860.8-813.48 in the regular season |
Postseason series tied, 1-1-0 |
Bad Karma has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Bad Karma has outscored Transient,
149.58-97.14 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 4 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 106.86 - 65.6 | 1993 | 6 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 42.92 - 39.34 | 1995 | 2 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 56.54 - 53.58 | 1995 | 10 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 73.86 - 63.92 | 1995 | 12 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 52.94 - 37.3 | 1995 | 13 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 55.32 - 39.02 | 1996 | 2 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 56.68 - 34.34 | 1996 | 10 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 95.54 - 61.32 | 1996 | 12 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 42.22 - 18.8 | 1997 | 1 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 49.5 - 41.94 | 1998 | 1 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 71.84 - 61.86 | 1999 | 3 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 77.6 - 61.72 | 2000 | 6 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 87.68 - 74.64 | 2000 | 9 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 76.72 - 43.78 | 2000 | 11 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 77.62 - 47.62 | |
|
Game 3
Largesse
(7-17-1) W1 «
| 103.74 |
Perfect Stool
(17-8-0) L1
| 67.94 |
Perfect Stool leads overall, 12-4-0 |
Largesse has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Perfect Stool has outscored Largesse,
996.62-867.48 overall |
Perfect Stool leads regular season series, 12-2-0 |
Perfect Stool has won 4 straight in the regular season series |
Perfect Stool has outscored Largesse,
863.64-685.4 in the regular season |
Largesse leads postseason series, 2-0-0 |
Largesse has won 2 straight postseason meetings |
Largesse has outscored Perfect Stool,
182.08-132.98 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 1 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 15.76 - 14.44 | 1993 | 2 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 44.62 - 20.72 | 1994 | 8 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 57.3 - 33.86 | 1995 | 7 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 63.66 - 40.4 | 1996 | 5 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 59.92 - 57.84 | 1996 | 9 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 48.02 - 43.32 | 1997 | 4 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 82.14 - 30.68 | 1998 | 5 | Largesse def. Perfect Stool | 79.94 - 52.56 | 1999 | 5 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 105.12 - 84.38 | 1999 | 9 | Largesse def. Perfect Stool | 49.1 - 38.96 | 1999 | 12 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 58.06 - 54.8 | 1999 | 14 | Largesse def. Perfect Stool | 78.34 - 65.04 | 2000 | 2 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 80.66 - 60.12 | 2000 | 10 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 91.76 - 63.62 | 2000 | 11 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 65.1 - 52.18 | |
|
Game 4
DTWG
(12-13-0) W2 «
| 69.32 |
OJ, Ray & Rae
(11-14-0) L2
| 44.92 |
DTWG leads overall, 4-3-0 |
DTWG has won 2 straight in the overall series |
DTWG has outscored OJ, Ray & Rae,
406.36-367.04 overall |
Regular season series tied, 3-3-0 |
DTWG has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
DTWG has outscored OJ, Ray & Rae,
337.04-322.12 in the regular season |
DTWG leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
DTWG has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
DTWG has outscored OJ, Ray & Rae,
69.32-44.92 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1999 | 7 | OJ, Ray & Rae def. DTWG | 69.84 - 47.52 | 1999 | 10 | DTWG def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 78.8 - 43.7 | 1999 | 12 | DTWG def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 42.78 - 37.08 | 2000 | 7 | OJ, Ray & Rae def. DTWG | 80.66 - 77.12 | 2000 | 10 | OJ, Ray & Rae def. DTWG | 46.58 - 41.44 | 2000 | 12 | DTWG def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 49.38 - 44.26 | |
|
Game 5
Just Say Julie
(15-10-0) W6 «
| 86.58 |
Bada Bing
(9-16-0) L3
| 65.86 |
Just Say Julie leads overall, 11-7-0 |
Just Say Julie has won 4 straight in the overall series |
Just Say Julie has outscored Bada Bing,
1050.64-907.34 overall |
Just Say Julie leads regular season series, 9-6-0 |
Just Say Julie has won 3 straight in the regular season series |
Just Say Julie has outscored Bada Bing,
844.76-760.18 in the regular season |
Just Say Julie leads postseason series, 2-1-0 |
Just Say Julie has won 2 straight postseason meetings |
Just Say Julie has outscored Bada Bing,
205.88-147.16 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 1 | Bada Bing def. Just Say Julie | 46.64 - 28.9 | 1993 | 11 | Bada Bing def. Just Say Julie | 78.38 - 39.04 | 1993 | 14 | Bada Bing def. Just Say Julie | 46.28 - 28.78 | 1994 | 1 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 88.22 - 54.4 | 1995 | 6 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 75.12 - 51.16 | 1995 | 8 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 78.28 - 64.36 | 1995 | 12 | Bada Bing def. Just Say Julie | 71.94 - 40.64 | 1996 | 4 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 44.12 - 29.86 | 1996 | 8 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 60.08 - 56.42 | 1996 | 11 | Bada Bing def. Just Say Julie | 68.64 - 55.7 | 1996 | 13 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 90.52 - 35.02 | 1997 | 2 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 34.06 - 23.06 | 1998 | 5 | Bada Bing def. Just Say Julie | 39.82 - 35.04 | 1999 | 1 | Bada Bing def. Just Say Julie | 66.82 - 56.3 | 2000 | 5 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 83.96 - 34.88 | 2000 | 9 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 48.88 - 32.42 | 2000 | 12 | Just Say Julie def. Bada Bing | 76.42 - 41.38 | |
|
Game 6
Marla
(10-15-0) W2 «
| 90.62 |
African Salad
(14-11-0) L5
| 56.12 |
Overall series tied, 9-9-0 |
Marla has won 2 straight in the overall series |
Marla has outscored African Salad,
986.66-960.66 overall |
African Salad leads regular season series, 9-7-0 |
Marla has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
African Salad has outscored Marla,
871.16-850.9 in the regular season |
Marla leads postseason series, 2-0-0 |
Marla has won 2 straight postseason meetings |
Marla has outscored African Salad,
135.76-89.5 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 2 | African Salad def. Marla | 70.16 - 49.1 | 1993 | 5 | Marla def. African Salad | 37.78 - 26.78 | 1994 | 4 | Marla def. African Salad | 72.4 - 15.28 | 1995 | 4 | Marla def. African Salad | 72.44 - 44.78 | 1995 | 10 | Marla def. African Salad | 59.46 - 35.3 | 1996 | 2 | African Salad def. Marla | 47.86 - 18.66 | 1997 | 2 | Marla def. African Salad | 62.4 - 54.46 | 1997 | 10 | African Salad def. Marla | 57.1 - 41.56 | 1997 | 12 | African Salad def. Marla | 64.98 - 62.42 | 1997 | 13 | Marla def. African Salad | 45.14 - 33.38 | 1998 | 1 | African Salad def. Marla | 61.42 - 45.42 | 1998 | 9 | African Salad def. Marla | 60.34 - 54.06 | 1998 | 11 | Marla def. African Salad | 84.96 - 62.42 | 1999 | 1 | African Salad def. Marla | 55.56 - 39.02 | 2000 | 2 | African Salad def. Marla | 91.52 - 47.68 | 2000 | 10 | African Salad def. Marla | 84.4 - 38.2 | 2000 | 12 | Marla def. African Salad | 65.34 - 38.8 | |
|