Game 1
Commandos
(9-13-0),
(6-9-0) W2 «
| 57.3 |
Rudy
(16-6-0),
(11-4-0) L2
| 42.1 |
Commandos leads regular season series, 4-3-0 |
Commandos has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Rudy has outscored Commandos,
403.72-363.96 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1996 | 6 | Commandos def. Rudy | 62.2 - 55.86 | 1997 | 2 | Commandos def. Rudy | 49.24 - 41.84 | 1998 | 6 | Rudy def. Commandos | 43.58 - 22.1 | 1999 | 4 | Commandos def. Rudy | 64.62 - 50.68 | 2000 | 7 | Rudy def. Commandos | 64.98 - 52.76 | 2000 | 8 | Rudy def. Commandos | 104.68 - 55.74 | |
|
Game 2
Perfect Stool
(15-7-0),
(10-5-0) W4 «
| 65.1 |
Rudy
(16-6-0),
(11-4-0) L2
| 42.1 |
Perfect Stool leads overall, 10-2-0 |
Perfect Stool has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Perfect Stool has outscored Rudy,
735.66-599.98 overall |
Perfect Stool leads regular season series, 9-2-0 |
Perfect Stool has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Perfect Stool has outscored Rudy,
687.46-554.4 in the regular season |
Perfect Stool leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
Perfect Stool has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Perfect Stool has outscored Rudy,
48.2-45.58 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1996 | 1 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 79.3 - 34.86 | 1996 | 9 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 48.02 - 46.6 | 1996 | 11 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 78.5 - 36.68 | 1996 | 13 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 48.2 - 45.58 | 1997 | 1 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 40.32 - 36.26 | 1998 | 3 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 63.08 - 62.52 | 1999 | 7 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 65.54 - 51.28 | 1999 | 10 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 65.36 - 47.52 | 1999 | 12 | Perfect Stool def. Rudy | 58.06 - 39.6 | 2000 | 1 | Rudy def. Perfect Stool | 85 - 63.56 | 2000 | 9 | Rudy def. Perfect Stool | 71.98 - 60.62 | |
|
Game 3
Perfect Stool
(15-7-0),
(10-5-0) W4 «
| 65.1 |
Largesse
(6-15-1),
(3-10-1) W1
| 52.18 |
Perfect Stool leads overall, 12-3-0 |
Perfect Stool has won 3 straight in the overall series |
Perfect Stool has outscored Largesse,
928.68-763.74 overall |
Perfect Stool leads regular season series, 12-2-0 |
Perfect Stool has won 4 straight in the regular season series |
Perfect Stool has outscored Largesse,
863.64-685.4 in the regular season |
Largesse leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
Largesse has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Largesse has outscored Perfect Stool,
78.34-65.04 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 1 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 15.76 - 14.44 | 1993 | 2 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 44.62 - 20.72 | 1994 | 8 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 57.3 - 33.86 | 1995 | 7 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 63.66 - 40.4 | 1996 | 5 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 59.92 - 57.84 | 1996 | 9 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 48.02 - 43.32 | 1997 | 4 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 82.14 - 30.68 | 1998 | 5 | Largesse def. Perfect Stool | 79.94 - 52.56 | 1999 | 5 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 105.12 - 84.38 | 1999 | 9 | Largesse def. Perfect Stool | 49.1 - 38.96 | 1999 | 12 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 58.06 - 54.8 | 1999 | 14 | Largesse def. Perfect Stool | 78.34 - 65.04 | 2000 | 2 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 80.66 - 60.12 | 2000 | 10 | Perfect Stool def. Largesse | 91.76 - 63.62 | |
|
Game 4
Largesse
(6-15-1),
(3-10-1) W1 «
| 52.18 |
Transient
(8-13-1),
(4-10-1) L2
| 47.62 |
Transient leads overall, 13-11-1 |
Largesse has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Transient has outscored Largesse,
1499.26-1349.74 overall |
Transient leads regular season series, 11-9-1 |
Largesse has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Transient has outscored Largesse,
1261.98-1120.04 in the regular season |
Postseason series tied, 2-2-0 |
Transient has won 2 straight postseason meetings |
Transient has outscored Largesse,
237.28-229.7 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 2 | Transient def. Largesse | 69.3 - 56.9 | 1992 | 14 | Largesse def. Transient | 38.4 - 18.5 | 1993 | 3 | Transient def. Largesse | 51.72 - 31.72 | 1994 | 13 | Transient def. Largesse | 65.38 - 34.08 | 1994 | 14 | Largesse def. Transient | 81.42 - 76.58 | 1995 | 1 | Transient def. Largesse | 74.76 - 35.8 | 1995 | 8 | Transient def. Largesse | 68.68 - 32.84 | 1995 | 11 | Largesse def. Transient | 60.08 - 56.18 | 1995 | 14 | Transient def. Largesse | 51.76 - 47.02 | 1996 | 4 | Transient def. Largesse | 92.34 - 65.74 | 1996 | 9 | Largesse def. Transient | 43.32 - 33.86 | 1996 | 11 | Transient def. Largesse | 79.48 - 64.12 | 1997 | 7 | Largesse def. Transient | 71.24 - 17.28 | 1997 | 10 | Largesse def. Transient | 67.5 - 54.98 | 1997 | 12 | Transient def. Largesse | 43.64 - 25.26 | 1997 | 14 | Transient def. Largesse | 90.44 - 62.86 | 1998 | 2 | Largesse def. Transient | 68.34 - 60.88 | 1998 | 10 | Largesse def. Transient | 47.12 - 42.64 | 1998 | 12 | Transient def. Largesse | 61.38 - 59.84 | 1999 | 7 | Transient def. Largesse | 56.14 - 37.82 | 1999 | 8 | Largesse def. Transient | 84.7 - 78.66 | 1999 | 11 | Transient def. Largesse | 101.92 - 70.92 | 2000 | 4 | Largesse def. Transient | 43.86 - 38.48 | 2000 | 8 | Largesse tied Transient | 66.66 - 66.66 | |
|
Game 5
Bad Karma
(16-6-0),
(10-5-0) W2 «
| 77.62 |
Transient
(8-13-1),
(4-10-1) L2
| 47.62 |
Transient leads overall, 9-6-0 |
Bad Karma has won 3 straight in the overall series |
Bad Karma has outscored Transient,
899.82-868.8 overall |
Transient leads regular season series, 8-6-0 |
Bad Karma has won 3 straight in the regular season series |
Bad Karma has outscored Transient,
860.8-813.48 in the regular season |
Transient leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
Transient has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Transient has outscored Bad Karma,
55.32-39.02 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 4 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 106.86 - 65.6 | 1993 | 6 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 42.92 - 39.34 | 1995 | 2 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 56.54 - 53.58 | 1995 | 10 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 73.86 - 63.92 | 1995 | 12 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 52.94 - 37.3 | 1995 | 13 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 55.32 - 39.02 | 1996 | 2 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 56.68 - 34.34 | 1996 | 10 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 95.54 - 61.32 | 1996 | 12 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 42.22 - 18.8 | 1997 | 1 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 49.5 - 41.94 | 1998 | 1 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 71.84 - 61.86 | 1999 | 3 | Transient def. Bad Karma | 77.6 - 61.72 | 2000 | 6 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 87.68 - 74.64 | 2000 | 9 | Bad Karma def. Transient | 76.72 - 43.78 | |
|
Game 6
Bad Karma
(16-6-0),
(10-5-0) W2 «
| 77.62 |
Trish Stratus
(8-14-0),
(7-8-0) L2
| 27.4 |
Bad Karma leads regular season series, 5-2-0 |
Bad Karma has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
Bad Karma has outscored Trish Stratus,
471.82-311.96 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1996 | 6 | Bad Karma def. Trish Stratus | 58.82 - 50.22 | 1997 | 4 | Trish Stratus def. Bad Karma | 78.56 - 55.76 | 1998 | 2 | Bad Karma def. Trish Stratus | 48.72 - 30.58 | 1999 | 1 | Bad Karma def. Trish Stratus | 72.66 - 36.14 | 2000 | 1 | Trish Stratus def. Bad Karma | 48.94 - 34.46 | 2000 | 8 | Bad Karma def. Trish Stratus | 123.78 - 40.12 | |
|
Game 7
Commandos
(9-13-0),
(6-9-0) W2 «
| 57.3 |
Trish Stratus
(8-14-0),
(7-8-0) L2
| 27.4 |
Trish Stratus leads regular season series, 5-4-0 |
Commandos has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Commandos has outscored Trish Stratus,
487.94-428.82 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1996 | 4 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 39.08 - 35.46 | 1996 | 9 | Commandos def. Trish Stratus | 57.56 - 35.78 | 1996 | 11 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 45.18 - 33.62 | 1997 | 5 | Commandos def. Trish Stratus | 82.54 - 46.68 | 1998 | 1 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 86.8 - 67.46 | 1999 | 1 | Commandos def. Trish Stratus | 47.94 - 36.14 | 2000 | 4 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 50.04 - 46.14 | 2000 | 9 | Trish Stratus def. Commandos | 61.72 - 59.92 | |
|
Game 8
Just Say Julie
(12-10-0),
(10-5-0) W2 «
| 75.84 |
Papal Bull
(12-10-0),
(9-6-0) L2
| 61.9 |
Just Say Julie leads overall, 10-8-0 |
Just Say Julie has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Just Say Julie has outscored Papal Bull,
1078.5-947.68 overall |
Just Say Julie leads regular season series, 9-8-0 |
Just Say Julie has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Just Say Julie has outscored Papal Bull,
1005.14-903.4 in the regular season |
Just Say Julie leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
Just Say Julie has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Just Say Julie has outscored Papal Bull,
73.36-44.28 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 3 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 86.06 - 28.54 | 1993 | 2 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 46.22 - 42.68 | 1994 | 11 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 73.52 - 54.52 | 1995 | 4 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 75.02 - 58.1 | 1996 | 1 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 61.62 - 57 | 1997 | 1 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 98.7 - 63.56 | 1997 | 9 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 55.38 - 37.6 | 1997 | 11 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 58.06 - 38.7 | 1998 | 4 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 63.78 - 57.82 | 1998 | 9 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 45.68 - 32.3 | 1998 | 11 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 35.58 - 26.92 | 1999 | 4 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 41.8 - 32.2 | 1999 | 9 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 82.28 - 34 | 1999 | 11 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 72.16 - 56.36 | 1999 | 13 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 73.36 - 44.28 | 2000 | 1 | Just Say Julie def. Papal Bull | 79.62 - 59.14 | 2000 | 9 | Papal Bull def. Just Say Julie | 67 - 48.88 | |
|
Game 9
Just Say Julie
(12-10-0),
(10-5-0) W2 «
| 75.84 |
Marla
(8-14-0),
(4-11-0) L4
| 56.92 |
Just Say Julie leads regular season series, 9-4-0 |
Just Say Julie has won 3 straight in the regular season series |
Just Say Julie has outscored Marla,
745.56-590.64 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 9 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 63.84 - 30.44 | 1993 | 13 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 46.98 - 28.8 | 1994 | 7 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 55.9 - 25.26 | 1995 | 6 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 75.12 - 53.78 | 1996 | 5 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 72.9 - 12.12 | 1996 | 9 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 48.76 - 42.42 | 1996 | 12 | Marla def. Just Say Julie | 44.04 - 28.34 | 1997 | 4 | Marla def. Just Say Julie | 85.9 - 33.76 | 1998 | 6 | Marla def. Just Say Julie | 54.28 - 40.02 | 1999 | 7 | Marla def. Just Say Julie | 57.88 - 47.42 | 2000 | 7 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 78.14 - 48.06 | 2000 | 8 | Just Say Julie def. Marla | 78.54 - 50.74 | |
|
Game 10
DTWG
(10-12-0),
(6-8-0) W2 «
| 91.42 |
Marla
(8-14-0),
(4-11-0) L4
| 56.92 |
Marla leads overall, 10-8-0 |
DTWG has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Marla has outscored DTWG,
1045.8-1021.42 overall |
Marla leads regular season series, 10-6-0 |
DTWG has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Marla has outscored DTWG,
930.04-883.18 in the regular season |
DTWG leads postseason series, 2-0-0 |
DTWG has won 2 straight postseason meetings |
DTWG has outscored Marla,
138.24-115.76 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 10 | Marla def. DTWG | 80.22 - 41.24 | 1993 | 6 | Marla def. DTWG | 73.32 - 48.52 | 1994 | 8 | Marla def. DTWG | 49.32 - 28.74 | 1995 | 7 | DTWG def. Marla | 88.52 - 61.58 | 1995 | 8 | Marla def. DTWG | 57.56 - 50.38 | 1995 | 11 | Marla def. DTWG | 69.7 - 55.02 | 1995 | 13 | DTWG def. Marla | 70.16 - 69.46 | 1996 | 4 | Marla def. DTWG | 24.38 - 21.84 | 1996 | 7 | Marla def. DTWG | 43.04 - 42.54 | 1996 | 10 | DTWG def. Marla | 64.84 - 48.9 | 1996 | 13 | DTWG def. Marla | 68.08 - 46.3 | 1997 | 4 | Marla def. DTWG | 85.9 - 62.08 | 1997 | 10 | DTWG def. Marla | 59.24 - 41.56 | 1998 | 3 | DTWG def. Marla | 53.76 - 45.58 | 1999 | 4 | Marla def. DTWG | 66.76 - 36.9 | 2000 | 4 | DTWG def. Marla | 82.92 - 58.16 | 2000 | 9 | Marla def. DTWG | 67.14 - 55.22 | |
|
Game 11
DTWG
(10-12-0),
(6-8-0) W2 «
| 91.42 |
African Salad
(14-8-0),
(9-6-0) L2
| 62.94 |
DTWG leads overall, 14-4-0 |
DTWG has won 1 straight in the overall series |
DTWG has outscored African Salad,
1092.28-926.74 overall |
DTWG leads regular season series, 13-4-0 |
DTWG has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
DTWG has outscored African Salad,
1034.1-873.88 in the regular season |
DTWG leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
DTWG has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
DTWG has outscored African Salad,
58.18-52.86 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 1 | African Salad def. DTWG | 74 - 67.96 | 1993 | 13 | DTWG def. African Salad | 47 - 37.64 | 1994 | 10 | DTWG def. African Salad | 59.2 - 40.9 | 1995 | 2 | African Salad def. DTWG | 65.02 - 33.74 | 1995 | 10 | DTWG def. African Salad | 50.88 - 35.3 | 1995 | 12 | DTWG def. African Salad | 71.54 - 68.46 | 1996 | 2 | DTWG def. African Salad | 74.36 - 47.86 | 1997 | 7 | DTWG def. African Salad | 82.14 - 58.98 | 1997 | 8 | DTWG def. African Salad | 49.12 - 40.48 | 1997 | 11 | DTWG def. African Salad | 39.06 - 26.56 | 1998 | 4 | DTWG def. African Salad | 72.18 - 63.58 | 1999 | 3 | DTWG def. African Salad | 70.84 - 35.28 | 1999 | 7 | DTWG def. African Salad | 47.52 - 35.28 | 1999 | 8 | DTWG def. African Salad | 56.56 - 15.08 | 1999 | 13 | DTWG def. African Salad | 58.18 - 52.86 | 2000 | 1 | African Salad def. DTWG | 94.18 - 53.56 | 2000 | 8 | African Salad def. DTWG | 72.34 - 67.02 | |
|
Game 12
Bada Bing
(9-13-0),
(6-9-0) W2 «
| 69.88 |
African Salad
(14-8-0),
(9-6-0) L2
| 62.94 |
African Salad leads overall, 11-6-0 |
Bada Bing has won 1 straight in the overall series |
African Salad has outscored Bada Bing,
905.72-772.06 overall |
African Salad leads regular season series, 9-5-0 |
Bada Bing has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
African Salad has outscored Bada Bing,
731.58-624.22 in the regular season |
African Salad leads postseason series, 2-1-0 |
Bada Bing has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
African Salad has outscored Bada Bing,
174.14-147.84 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1992 | 7 | Bada Bing def. African Salad | 29.8 - 26.02 | 1993 | 10 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 61.42 - 34.9 | 1993 | 15 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 54.76 - 13.66 | 1994 | 7 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 54.86 - 27.1 | 1994 | 14 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 65.94 - 45.68 | 1995 | 4 | Bada Bing def. African Salad | 51.82 - 44.78 | 1996 | 1 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 62.36 - 49.44 | 1997 | 3 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 66.14 - 59.36 | 1997 | 9 | Bada Bing def. African Salad | 73.2 - 48.7 | 1998 | 2 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 90.8 - 52.66 | 1998 | 10 | Bada Bing def. African Salad | 46.22 - 28.06 | 1998 | 11 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 62.42 - 35.88 | 1998 | 14 | Bada Bing def. African Salad | 88.5 - 53.44 | 1999 | 2 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 48.7 - 45.24 | 2000 | 6 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 40.04 - 16.3 | 2000 | 9 | African Salad def. Bada Bing | 34.34 - 32.42 | |
|
Game 13
Bada Bing
(9-13-0),
(6-9-0) W2 «
| 69.88 |
OJ, Ray & Rae
(10-12-0),
(8-7-0) W1
| 69.68 |
Regular season series tied, 2-2-0 |
Bada Bing has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
Bada Bing has outscored OJ, Ray & Rae,
210.98-201.46 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1999 | 3 | OJ, Ray & Rae def. Bada Bing | 41.5 - 40.62 | 2000 | 4 | OJ, Ray & Rae def. Bada Bing | 63.88 - 58.54 | 2000 | 8 | Bada Bing def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 41.94 - 26.4 | |
|
Game 14
OJ, Ray & Rae
(10-12-0),
(8-7-0) W1 «
| 69.68 |
Papal Bull
(12-10-0),
(9-6-0) L2
| 61.9 |
Papal Bull leads regular season series, 5-1-0 |
OJ, Ray & Rae has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Papal Bull has outscored OJ, Ray & Rae,
385.24-319.22 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
1999 | 1 | Papal Bull def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 56.44 - 44.76 | 1999 | 7 | Papal Bull def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 72.84 - 69.84 | 1999 | 10 | Papal Bull def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 59.54 - 43.7 | 2000 | 2 | Papal Bull def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 66.06 - 44.66 | 2000 | 10 | Papal Bull def. OJ, Ray & Rae | 68.46 - 46.58 | |
|