Game 1
MacAttack
(2-5-0) L1
| 81.7 |
Quake
(4-3-0) W3 «
| 94.5 |
Quake leads regular season series, 9-2-0 |
Quake has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
Quake has outscored MacAttack,
1301.5-1142.1 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
2005 | 7 | MacAttack def. Quake | 106.7 - 86.85 | 2006 | 7 | Quake def. MacAttack | 115.5 - 92.05 | 2007 | 9 | Quake def. MacAttack | 157.25 - 118.7 | 2008 | 1 | Quake def. MacAttack | 90.1 - 86 | 2008 | 12 | Quake def. MacAttack | 135.65 - 103.6 | 2009 | 5 | Quake def. MacAttack | 122.5 - 75.6 | 2009 | 10 | Quake def. MacAttack | 140.05 - 108.1 | 2010 | 7 | Quake def. MacAttack | 147.4 - 146.45 | 2011 | 7 | MacAttack def. Quake | 120.65 - 101.25 | 2012 | 7 | Quake def. MacAttack | 110.45 - 102.55 | |
|
Game 2
Ditka
(4-3-0) L3
| 46.9 |
HoosierDaddy
(4-3-0) W2 «
| 138.4 |
HoosierDaddy leads regular season series, 3-0-0 |
HoosierDaddy has won 3 straight in the regular season series |
HoosierDaddy has outscored Ditka,
349.6-213.8 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
2011 | 7 | HoosierDaddy def. Ditka | 63.4 - 61.45 | 2012 | 7 | HoosierDaddy def. Ditka | 147.8 - 105.45 | |
|
Game 3
Technosynthesis
(3-4-0) L3
| 111.7 |
Pulverizers
(4-3-0) W1 «
| 125.25 |
Pulverizers leads overall, 9-2-0 |
Pulverizers has won 6 straight in the overall series |
Pulverizers has outscored Technosynthesis,
1367.1-1075.2 overall |
Pulverizers leads regular season series, 8-2-0 |
Pulverizers has won 5 straight in the regular season series |
Pulverizers has outscored Technosynthesis,
1260.8-977.2 in the regular season |
Pulverizers leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
Pulverizers has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Pulverizers has outscored Technosynthesis,
106.3-98 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
2005 | 7 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 118.8 - 67.25 | 2006 | 7 | Technosynthesis def. Pulverizers | 128.15 - 83.15 | 2007 | 9 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 162.55 - 84.2 | 2008 | 7 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 113.55 - 54.1 | 2009 | 7 | Technosynthesis def. Pulverizers | 113.15 - 107.85 | 2009 | 9 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 150.45 - 122 | 2010 | 7 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 136.5 - 91.1 | 2011 | 7 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 146.5 - 111.35 | 2012 | 7 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 116.2 - 94.2 | 2012 | 15 | Pulverizers def. Technosynthesis | 106.3 - 98 | |
|
Game 4
Stays in Vegas
(6-1-0) W5 «
| 114.55 |
Barley Maltheads
(6-1-0) L1
| 109.05 |
Stays in Vegas leads overall, 5-4-0 |
Stays in Vegas has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Barley Maltheads has outscored Stays in Vegas,
1089.75-974.75 overall |
Stays in Vegas leads regular season series, 5-3-0 |
Stays in Vegas has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Barley Maltheads has outscored Stays in Vegas,
940.95-853.1 in the regular season |
Barley Maltheads leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
Barley Maltheads has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Barley Maltheads has outscored Stays in Vegas,
148.8-121.65 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
2006 | 7 | Stays in Vegas def. Barley Maltheads | 85.75 - 79.8 | 2007 | 9 | Barley Maltheads def. Stays in Vegas | 154.05 - 87.5 | 2008 | 7 | Stays in Vegas def. Barley Maltheads | 119.1 - 93.35 | 2009 | 3 | Stays in Vegas def. Barley Maltheads | 119.8 - 87.35 | 2010 | 7 | Barley Maltheads def. Stays in Vegas | 128.9 - 123.1 | 2011 | 7 | Stays in Vegas def. Barley Maltheads | 136.2 - 134.05 | 2011 | 14 | Barley Maltheads def. Stays in Vegas | 148.8 - 121.65 | 2012 | 7 | Barley Maltheads def. Stays in Vegas | 154.4 - 67.1 | |
|
Game 5
Jaekim Noah
(1-6-0) L6
| 125.15 |
Gladiators
(2-5-0) W1 «
| 131.8 |
Gladiators leads overall, 7-6-0 |
Gladiators has won 1 straight in the overall series |
Jaekim Noah has outscored Gladiators,
1438.15-1384.9 overall |
Gladiators leads regular season series, 5-4-0 |
Gladiators has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
Jaekim Noah has outscored Gladiators,
966-899.65 in the regular season |
Postseason series tied, 2-2-0 |
Jaekim Noah has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
Gladiators has outscored Jaekim Noah,
485.25-472.15 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
2005 | 7 | Gladiators def. Jaekim Noah | 110.7 - 87.2 | 2005 | 14 | Jaekim Noah def. Gladiators | 127.25 - 122.6 | 2006 | 7 | Gladiators def. Jaekim Noah | 114 - 75.2 | 2007 | 9 | Jaekim Noah def. Gladiators | 92.9 - 83.5 | 2008 | 7 | Gladiators def. Jaekim Noah | 135.55 - 108.25 | 2008 | 16 | Gladiators def. Jaekim Noah | 127.65 - 86.2 | 2009 | 2 | Gladiators def. Jaekim Noah | 141.5 - 107.95 | 2009 | 14 | Gladiators def. Jaekim Noah | 132.45 - 100.4 | 2010 | 7 | Jaekim Noah def. Gladiators | 123.2 - 75.05 | 2010 | 16 | Jaekim Noah def. Gladiators | 158.3 - 102.55 | 2011 | 7 | Jaekim Noah def. Gladiators | 106.7 - 63.15 | 2012 | 7 | Jaekim Noah def. Gladiators | 139.45 - 44.4 | |
|
Game 6
Schrute Beet Farmers
(3-4-0) W3 «
| 117.8 |
The Mike Wazowskis
(3-4-0) L2
| 90.05 |
Regular season series tied, 5-5-0 |
Schrute Beet Farmers has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
Schrute Beet Farmers has outscored The Mike Wazowskis,
1070.3-1047.65 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
Season | Week | Result | Score |
---|
2006 | 7 | Schrute Beet Farmers def. The Mike Wazowskis | 131.1 - 108.5 | 2007 | 9 | The Mike Wazowskis def. Schrute Beet Farmers | 114.95 - 101.4 | 2008 | 1 | Schrute Beet Farmers def. The Mike Wazowskis | 120.45 - 66.5 | 2008 | 12 | The Mike Wazowskis def. Schrute Beet Farmers | 116.1 - 82 | 2009 | 7 | The Mike Wazowskis def. Schrute Beet Farmers | 142.7 - 102.55 | 2009 | 9 | The Mike Wazowskis def. Schrute Beet Farmers | 105.45 - 84.95 | 2010 | 7 | Schrute Beet Farmers def. The Mike Wazowskis | 116.7 - 108.75 | 2011 | 7 | The Mike Wazowskis def. Schrute Beet Farmers | 102.1 - 94.65 | 2012 | 7 | Schrute Beet Farmers def. The Mike Wazowskis | 118.7 - 92.55 | |
|