MFLHistory
Version 1.51

Admin Menu

Return of the Champions XXV2016 Week 2 Game Center


Week: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16

Regular Game(s)
Game 1
TeamScore
Ramrod Red Devils (1-1-0), (1-1-0) L1 132.96
Fast Eddys Chili (2-0-0), (2-0-0) W2
«
133.97
Fast Eddys Chili leads overall, 12-11-0
Fast Eddys Chili has won 1 straight in the overall series
Ramrod Red Devils has outscored Fast Eddys Chili, 3214.57-3135.67 overall
Fast Eddys Chili leads regular season series, 12-8-0
Fast Eddys Chili has won 1 straight in the regular season series
Fast Eddys Chili has outscored Ramrod Red Devils, 2717.34-2687.56 in the regular season
Ramrod Red Devils leads postseason series, 3-0-0
Ramrod Red Devils has won 3 straight postseason meetings
Ramrod Red Devils has outscored Fast Eddys Chili, 527.01-418.33 in the postseason
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
20057Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili132.91 - 109.57
20067Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili163.28 - 112.74
20074Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils149.06 - 112.29
200714Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili173.89 - 146.11
20088Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili175.63 - 98.39
200811Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils129.52 - 128.05
200814Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili168.64 - 115.55
20096Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils152.78 - 147.58
20099Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils177.02 - 153.78
20106Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils136.5 - 105.43
20109Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils131.75 - 130.92
20119Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils141.88 - 141.7
201112Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils124.86 - 79.67
20122Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils152.06 - 100.4
201212Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils171.1 - 129.72
20132Fast Eddys Chili def. Ramrod Red Devils172.54 - 121.24
201312Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili147.7 - 125.89
201314Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili184.48 - 156.67
20142Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili134.92 - 124.23
201412Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili128.32 - 120.04
20152Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili135.22 - 116.87
201512Ramrod Red Devils def. Fast Eddys Chili185.84 - 136.57
Game 2
TeamScore
Krypton Knights (1-1-0), (1-1-0) W1
«
117.82
Flaming Chankla Chuckers (0-2-0), (0-2-0) L2 114.03
Krypton Knights leads overall, 13-5-0
Krypton Knights has won 4 straight in the overall series
Krypton Knights has outscored Flaming Chankla Chuckers , 2641.34-2436.11 overall
Krypton Knights leads regular season series, 11-4-0
Krypton Knights has won 4 straight in the regular season series
Krypton Knights has outscored Flaming Chankla Chuckers , 2201.27-2005.84 in the regular season
Krypton Knights leads postseason series, 2-1-0
Krypton Knights has won 2 straight postseason meetings
Krypton Knights has outscored Flaming Chankla Chuckers , 440.07-430.27 in the postseason
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
20096Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 145.47 - 116.49
20099Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 134.97 - 112.34
20106Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 164.17 - 136.19
20109Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 148.24 - 130.52
201015Flaming Chankla Chuckers def. Krypton Knights150.63 - 133.68
20119Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 160.13 - 130.25
201112Flaming Chankla Chuckers def. Krypton Knights201 - 178.04
201114Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 181.88 - 176.77
20122Flaming Chankla Chuckers def. Krypton Knights148.15 - 138.09
201212Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 152.37 - 131.36
20132Flaming Chankla Chuckers def. Krypton Knights157.18 - 150.2
201312Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 144.91 - 123.95
201316Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 124.51 - 102.87
20142Flaming Chankla Chuckers def. Krypton Knights149.16 - 133.31
201412Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 160.26 - 126.94
20152Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 144.67 - 105.9
201512Krypton Knights def. Flaming Chankla Chuckers 128.62 - 122.38
Game 3
TeamScore
Grindhouse Zombies (1-1-0), (1-1-0) W1
«
154.97
Speed Inc (0-2-0), (0-2-0) L2 110.21
Grindhouse Zombies leads regular season series, 11-5-0
Grindhouse Zombies has won 4 straight in the regular season series
Grindhouse Zombies has outscored Speed Inc, 2299.8-1826.52 in the regular season
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
20086Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc136.24 - 110.23
20089Speed Inc def. Grindhouse Zombies132.17 - 99.81
20096Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc173.85 - 127.29
200912Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc117.76 - 115.46
20106Speed Inc def. Grindhouse Zombies157.17 - 105.21
201011Speed Inc def. Grindhouse Zombies110.39 - 109.24
20119Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc162.38 - 96.61
20122Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc145.53 - 77.66
201212Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc182.1 - 93.4
20132Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc226.93 - 115.45
201312Speed Inc def. Grindhouse Zombies117.47 - 100.67
20142Speed Inc def. Grindhouse Zombies130.37 - 127.2
201412Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc139.9 - 86.41
20152Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc174.31 - 143.38
201512Grindhouse Zombies def. Speed Inc143.7 - 102.85
Game 4
TeamScore
Phishermen (2-0-0), (2-0-0) W2
«
167.39
St Louis Rules (1-1-0), (1-1-0) L1 148.82
Phishermen leads overall, 15-5-0
Phishermen has won 1 straight in the overall series
Phishermen has outscored St Louis Rules, 2864.65-2522.37 overall
Phishermen leads regular season series, 14-5-0
Phishermen has won 1 straight in the regular season series
Phishermen has outscored St Louis Rules, 2703.33-2381.42 in the regular season
Phishermen leads postseason series, 1-0-0
Phishermen has won 1 straight postseason meetings
Phishermen has outscored St Louis Rules, 161.32-140.95 in the postseason
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
200512Phishermen def. St Louis Rules165.91 - 137.47
20065Phishermen def. St Louis Rules124.13 - 116.54
20073St Louis Rules def. Phishermen140.91 - 129.12
20086St Louis Rules def. Phishermen151.55 - 134.05
20089Phishermen def. St Louis Rules125.63 - 99.09
20096Phishermen def. St Louis Rules151.99 - 84.81
200912Phishermen def. St Louis Rules163.99 - 124.11
20106Phishermen def. St Louis Rules167.25 - 124.5
201011St Louis Rules def. Phishermen164.33 - 162.01
20119Phishermen def. St Louis Rules126.92 - 124.08
20122Phishermen def. St Louis Rules129.69 - 109.67
201212Phishermen def. St Louis Rules138.68 - 108.84
20132Phishermen def. St Louis Rules166.55 - 109.68
201312Phishermen def. St Louis Rules126.51 - 111.38
20142St Louis Rules def. Phishermen123.21 - 113.94
201412Phishermen def. St Louis Rules149.38 - 137.61
201414Phishermen def. St Louis Rules161.32 - 140.95
20152Phishermen def. St Louis Rules150.54 - 136.98
201512St Louis Rules def. Phishermen127.84 - 109.65
Game 5
TeamScore
Jeepsters (2-0-0), (2-0-0) W2
«
127.05
Drunken Badgers (1-1-0), (1-1-0) L1 107.83
Jeepsters leads regular season series, 3-2-0
Jeepsters has won 2 straight in the regular season series
Drunken Badgers has outscored Jeepsters, 681.99-659.58 in the regular season
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
20142Drunken Badgers def. Jeepsters133.48 - 121.9
201412Jeepsters def. Drunken Badgers159.94 - 135.27
20152Drunken Badgers def. Jeepsters174.58 - 113.79
201512Jeepsters def. Drunken Badgers136.9 - 130.83
Game 6
TeamScore
Angels of Harlem (0-2-0), (0-2-0) L2 148.87
G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition (1-1-0), (1-1-0) W1
«
163.42
Angels of Harlem leads overall, 10-4-0
G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition has won 1 straight in the overall series
Angels of Harlem has outscored G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition, 2023.7-1639.84 overall
Angels of Harlem leads regular season series, 9-4-0
G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition has won 1 straight in the regular season series
Angels of Harlem has outscored G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition, 1878.24-1534.61 in the regular season
Angels of Harlem leads postseason series, 1-0-0
Angels of Harlem has won 1 straight postseason meetings
Angels of Harlem has outscored G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition, 145.46-105.23 in the postseason
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
20104Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition109.44 - 97.25
20109Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition117.46 - 85.53
20116G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition def. Angels of Harlem121.36 - 108.76
201111Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition159.94 - 102.14
201115Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition145.46 - 105.23
20122Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition213.34 - 98.38
201212Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition142.47 - 115.35
20132Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition175.6 - 96.52
201312Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition139.7 - 117.37
20142Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition164.49 - 103.82
201412G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition def. Angels of Harlem194.66 - 147.46
20152G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition def. Angels of Harlem124.17 - 120.47
201512Angels of Harlem def. G.A.M.E. Grown Ass Man Edition130.24 - 114.64
Game 7
TeamScore
Dark Phoenix (1-1-0), (1-1-0) W1
«
151.31
Hitmen (0-2-0), (0-2-0) L2 124.25
Dark Phoenix leads overall, 13-9-0
Dark Phoenix has won 3 straight in the overall series
Dark Phoenix has outscored Hitmen, 3176.66-2910.17 overall
Dark Phoenix leads regular season series, 12-8-0
Dark Phoenix has won 2 straight in the regular season series
Dark Phoenix has outscored Hitmen, 2889.9-2633.05 in the regular season
Postseason series tied, 1-1-0
Dark Phoenix has won 1 straight postseason meetings
Dark Phoenix has outscored Hitmen, 286.76-277.12 in the postseason
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
200513Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix189.6 - 134.15
200613Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix141.79 - 132.29
200614Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix126.75 - 121.2
200713Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen161.22 - 126.01
20088Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen151.04 - 116.44
200811Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen166.16 - 119.85
20098Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen163.58 - 122.89
200911Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen166.7 - 129.21
20106Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix144.22 - 108.8
20108Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen158.27 - 134.72
20114Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen123.61 - 112.54
20118Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen121.78 - 120.8
20122Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix134.99 - 132.39
201212Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix131.75 - 115.22
20132Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix125.09 - 115.35
201312Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen175.28 - 107.47
20142Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix132.33 - 127.15
201412Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen190.11 - 119.23
20152Hitmen def. Dark Phoenix157.33 - 136.14
201512Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen159.35 - 142.54
201514Dark Phoenix def. Hitmen165.56 - 150.37
Game 8
TeamScore
Samurai Warriors (1-1-0), (1-1-0) L1 90.57
Angry Amish Avengers (2-0-0), (2-0-0) W2
«
144.25
Regular season series tied, 9-9-0
Angry Amish Avengers has won 3 straight in the regular season series
Angry Amish Avengers has outscored Samurai Warriors, 2336.35-2245.53 in the regular season
Previous Matchups
SeasonWeekResultScore
20077Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors144.11 - 135.38
20088Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers146.42 - 115.3
200811Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers146.85 - 146.04
20098Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers156.91 - 117.65
200911Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers135.63 - 118.14
20106Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers133.4 - 118.3
20108Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors112.57 - 90.98
20114Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers159.07 - 106.82
20118Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors131.34 - 90.03
20122Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers151.79 - 116.02
201212Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors175.27 - 103.89
20132Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors151.04 - 141.52
201312Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors159.79 - 98.74
20142Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers116.62 - 109.99
201412Samurai Warriors def. Angry Amish Avengers93.54 - 83.85
20152Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors142.62 - 129.49
201512Angry Amish Avengers def. Samurai Warriors143.25 - 124.7

Back to top
Copyright © 2013 MFLHistory.com All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: This site is not in any way affiliated with, endorsed or licensed by the National Football League, any NFL team or NFLPA member.