Game 1
| Sizzle
(4-2-0) W1 «
| 132.85 |
| The Squathounds
(2-4-0) L2
| 80 |
| Overall series tied, 4-4-0 |
| Sizzle has won 2 straight in the overall series |
| Sizzle has outscored The Squathounds,
419.6-376 overall |
| Regular season series tied, 3-3-0 |
| Sizzle has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
| Sizzle has outscored The Squathounds,
324.6-294 in the regular season |
| Postseason series tied, 1-1-0 |
| Sizzle has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
| Sizzle has outscored The Squathounds,
95-82 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2007 | 6 | Sizzle def. The Squathounds | 40 - 28 | | 2008 | 16 | The Squathounds def. Sizzle | 54 - 47 | | 2009 | 6 | Sizzle def. The Squathounds | 51 - 41 | | 2010 | 6 | The Squathounds def. Sizzle | 39 - 22 | | 2012 | 6 | The Squathounds def. Sizzle | 50.5 - 49.75 | | 2015 | 6 | The Squathounds def. Sizzle | 55.5 - 29 | | 2016 | 16 | Sizzle def. The Squathounds | 48 - 28 | |
|
Game 2
| Red Army
(5-1-0) W4 «
| 122.9 |
| Junkyard Dogs
(2-4-0) L4
| 71.65 |
| Red Army leads regular season series, 4-2-0 |
| Red Army has won 3 straight in the regular season series |
| Red Army has outscored Junkyard Dogs,
293.15-234.9 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2011 | 6 | Junkyard Dogs def. Red Army | 41.5 - 30.75 | | 2012 | 7 | Red Army def. Junkyard Dogs | 34.5 - 24.5 | | 2013 | 6 | Junkyard Dogs def. Red Army | 38.75 - 38 | | 2014 | 7 | Red Army def. Junkyard Dogs | 27.25 - 19.5 | | 2016 | 6 | Red Army def. Junkyard Dogs | 39.75 - 39 | |
|
Game 3
| The RAGE
(3-3-0) W1 «
| 129.5 |
| Why So Serious
(4-2-0) L1
| 94.6 |
| Regular season series tied, 3-3-0 |
| The RAGE has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
| The RAGE has outscored Why So Serious,
288-248.6 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2008 | 7 | The RAGE def. Why So Serious | 24 - 22 | | 2011 | 6 | Why So Serious def. The RAGE | 32.5 - 21.25 | | 2012 | 6 | Why So Serious def. The RAGE | 31 - 29.25 | | 2014 | 7 | Why So Serious def. The RAGE | 37.25 - 33.25 | | 2016 | 7 | The RAGE def. Why So Serious | 50.75 - 31.25 | |
|
Game 4
| Lost in Place
(4-2-0) W1 «
| 128.7 |
| Funky Tit Monsters
(2-4-0) L1
| 70.25 |
| Lost in Place leads regular season series, 2-0-0 |
| Lost in Place has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
| Lost in Place has outscored Funky Tit Monsters,
166.7-99.5 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2016 | 7 | Lost in Place def. Funky Tit Monsters | 38 - 29.25 | |
|
Game 5
| Chazy Choppers
(3-3-0) L1
| 72.85 |
| Suicide Squad
(3-3-0) W2 «
| 105.4 |
| Regular season series tied, 1-1-0 |
| Suicide Squad has won 1 straight in the regular season series |
| Suicide Squad has outscored Chazy Choppers,
125.65-106.35 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2016 | 7 | Chazy Choppers def. Suicide Squad | 33.5 - 20.25 | |
|
Game 6
| In Beer We Trust
(0-6-0) L6
| 85.1 |
| Pouncing Pumas
(2-4-0) W1 «
| 105.4 |
| Pouncing Pumas leads regular season series, 2-0-0 |
| Pouncing Pumas has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
| Pouncing Pumas has outscored In Beer We Trust,
143.15-113.6 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2016 | 7 | Pouncing Pumas def. In Beer We Trust | 37.75 - 28.5 | |
|
Game 7
| TD's N BEER
(3-3-0) L2
| 111.1 |
| VikingQuest
(5-1-0) W5 «
| 148.05 |
| Overall series tied, 2-2-0 |
| VikingQuest has won 2 straight in the overall series |
| VikingQuest has outscored TD's N BEER,
233.55-200.6 overall |
| VikingQuest leads regular season series, 2-1-0 |
| VikingQuest has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
| VikingQuest has outscored TD's N BEER,
203.55-168.1 in the regular season |
| TD's N BEER leads postseason series, 1-0-0 |
| TD's N BEER has won 1 straight postseason meetings |
| TD's N BEER has outscored VikingQuest,
32.5-30 in the postseason |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2010 | 6 | TD's N BEER def. VikingQuest | 31.5 - 27.75 | | 2012 | 16 | TD's N BEER def. VikingQuest | 32.5 - 30 | | 2014 | 7 | VikingQuest def. TD's N BEER | 27.75 - 25.5 | |
|
Game 8
| Hoosier Daddy
(4-2-0) W3 «
| 108 |
| Epic Fail
(2-4-0) L1
| 84.55 |
| Hoosier Daddy leads regular season series, 2-0-0 |
| Hoosier Daddy has won 2 straight in the regular season series |
| Hoosier Daddy has outscored Epic Fail,
138.25-112.55 in the regular season |
Previous Matchups
| Season | Week | Result | Score |
|---|
| 2016 | 7 | Hoosier Daddy def. Epic Fail | 30.25 - 28 | |
|
